Re-eleição de Dilma comentada por Jean Wyllys, Cynara Menezes, Fernando Haddad, The Guardian, Sakamoto, dentre outros [A CASA DE VIDRO.COM]

Dilma Muda Mais

É TETRA! PT É ELEITO PARA A PRESIDÊNCIA PELA 4ª VEZ CONSECUTIVA

Jean Wyllys comenta a re-eleição da presidenta Dilma Roussef: “Não passarão, a gente disse — e não passaram! (…) Tem momentos históricos em que a gente precisa se unir para impedir um retrocesso, para não perder o que conquistamos, mesmo que esteja aquém dos nossos sonhos e utopias”, declarou Wyllys.

“A eleição do Aécio Neves teria sido uma tragédia para o Brasil não apenas pelo que ele mesmo representa, com sua arrogância machista, seu macartismo vintage, seu neoliberalismo radical e seu udenismo, falso como todo udenismo, mas também pelo conteúdo que sua campanha representou”, completou. [Jornal GGN]

O Brasil barrou o retrocesso… agora é expandir os avanços, nas redes e nas ruas, na demanda e na luta, puxando o PT pra esquerda com as múltiplas vozes dos movimentos sociais… Avante, MST – Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem TerraPasse Livre São PauloMovimento Xingu Vivo para SempreNINJAJornal A Nova DemocraciaMtst Trabalhadores Sem Teto, Marcha da Maconha, PSOL (Partido Socialismo e Liberdade), Agência Pública, Mães de Maio, entre tantos outros corações valentes!

* * * * *

EXISTE AMOR EM SP?

Dilma Vitoria 3
Dilma Vitoria

Dilma Vitoria 2

Fernando Haddad (o provável candidato do PT à presidência em 2018?), na Avenida Paulista, discursa frente à multidão que comemora a re-eleição de Dilma Rousseff. Haddad garante que a reforma política será prioridade, que os entulhos autoritários da sociedade brasileira precisam ser superados, e que o Brasil não deve se cindir em dois mas abraçar sua unidade. Ele aproveita também para alfinetar a sórdida campanha de Aécio Neves e do PSDB, em conluio com a imprensa burguesa golpista (vulgoP.I.G.), bradando: “Não se vence eleição no tapetão!” Não há dúvidas de que a revista Veja, da Abril, não escapará de punições na justiça e boicotes da população após seu crime eleitoral. Confira o vídeo de Haddad:

* * * * *

Cynara

“A elite brasileira e a imprensa que a representa odeiam, em primeiro lugar, Lula. Não porque Lula despreza as famílias que são donas dos meios de comunicação. É o contrário: Lula despreza as famílias que são donas dos meios de comunicação porque sempre foi maltratado por seus jornais, TVs e revistas, porque foi vítima de seu enorme preconceito de classe. A elite e a imprensa que a representa não suportam que não seja um dos seus que esteja à frente do poder no Brasil. Dilma Rousseff achou que podia seduzir a imprensa, atraí-la para seu lado. Doce ilusão. Foi um dos maiores erros do primeiro mandato e espero que corrija no segundo.” Cynara Menezes, a Socialista Morena

* * * * *

COMO VOTOU O BRASIL:

regioes2
regioes4
* * * * *

AMERICA LATINA

Líderes da América Latina, relata a Carta Capital, também celebram a re-eleição de Dilma Rousseff: os presidentes da Venezuela (Nicolás Maduro), do Equador (Rafael Correa) e da Argentina (Cristina Kirchner) mandam suas saudações à presidenta re-eleita. O sucessor de Chávez na presidência venezuelana, Maduro, manifestou-se pelo twitter: “Dilma venceu a guerra suja e a mentira” (uma menção às calúnias golpistas a que o PSDB de Aécio Neves recorreu, em conluio com a imprensa burguesa?) “Pôde mais a verdade de um povo que mira o futuro com esperança.” Pelo jeito, a VEJA pode até esbravejar e a Rede Globo pode até espernear, mas nos próximos anos a reforma da mídia e a reforma política vão ser top-prioridade do governo federal e do PT, assim como a estreitação dos laços e dos intercâmbios latino-americanos, para horror dos paranóicos reacionários que tem pavor do “bolivarismo”… 

* * * * *

REPERCUSSÃO INTERNACIONAL: THE GUARDIAN

Glenn Greenwald

Dilma Rousseff pledges unity after narrow Brazil election victory

* * * * *

Leia também:

 

Bloodshed in Gaza – The Historical Roots of the Conflict

Art by Venezuelan artist Eneko, with reference to Pablo Picasso's "Guernica"

Art by Venezuelan artist Eneko updates Pablo Picasso’s “Guernica”

I’m deeply saddened and worried by the ongoing bloodshed in Gaza. One of the most densely populated areas in the planet, home for 1.8 million people, 56% of them under the age of 18, what’s happening in Gaza right now is a heartbreaking historical tragedy unfolding before our eyes.  According to the The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA),  these are the disaster’s description in numbers today – July 23, 2014, 16 days after the start of Israel’s military attack: 697 Palestinians killed, including at least 518 civilians, of whom 170 are children and 86 are women; 32 Israelis killed, including 3 civilians and 29 soldiers; 3.993 Palestinians injured (1.213 are children and 698 are women); more than 140.000 have been displaced and 1.2 million people in Gaza have no proper access to water.

Watch Al Jazeera’s Gaza’s Humanitarian Disaster:

The latest news about the conflict are all around the news – I particularly recommend tuning in to Al Jazeera or independent blogs such as Gazanism – so I’d like to share with you some material that can enlighten us about the historical roots of the present crisis. I’d like to start quoting from one of the world’s greatest writers and activists, Mrs. Arundathi Roy, a well-informed and highly sensitive witness to all the sound and fury of human history:

Arundhati Roy

Arundhati Roy

In 1937 Winston Churchill said of the Palestinians: ‘I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance that a great wrong has been done to the red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place’. That set the trend for the Israeli state’s attitude towards Palestinians. In 1969, Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir said: ‘Palestinians do not exist’. Her successor, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, said: ‘What are Palestinians? When I came here [to Palestine] there were 250,000 non-Jews, mainly Arabs and Bedouins. It was desert, more than underdeveloped. Nothing’. Prime Minister Menachem Begin called Palestinians ‘two-legged beasts’. Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir called them ‘grasshoppers’ who could be crushed. This is the language of heads of state, not the words of ordinary people.

In 1947 the UN formally partitioned Palestine and allotted 55% of Palestine’s land to the zionists. Within a year they had captured 78%. On May 14, 1948, the state of Israel was declared. Minutes after the declaration, the US recognized Israel. The West Bank was annexed by Jordan. The Gaza strip came under Egyptian military control. Formally, Palestine ceased to exist except in the minds and hearts of the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian people who became refugees.

In the summer of 1967, Israel occupied the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Settlers were offered state subsidies and development aid to move into the occupied territories. Almost every day more Palestinian families are forced off their lands and driven into refugee camps. Palestinians who continue to live in Israel do not have the same rights as Israelis and live as second-class citizens in their former homeland.

Art by Brazilian cartoonist Carlos Latuff

Art by Brazilian cartoonist Carlos Latuff

Over the decades there have been uprisings, wars, intifadas. Tens of thousands have lost their lives. Accords and treaties have been signed, ceasefires declared and violated. But the bloodshed doesn’t end. Palestine still remains illegally occupied. Its people live in inhuman conditions, in virtual Bantustans, where they are subjected to collective punishments, 24-hour curfews, where they are humiliated and brutalised on a daily basis. They never know when their homes will be demolished, when their children will be shot, when their precious trees will be cut, when their roads will be closed, when they will be allowed to walk down to the market to buy food and medicine. And when they will not. They live with no semblance of dignity. With not much hope in sight. They have no control over their lands, their security, their movement, their communication, their water supply.

So when accords are signed and words like ‘autonomy’ and even ‘statehood’ are bandied about, it’s always worth asking: What sort of autonomy? What sort of state? What sort of rights will its citizens have? Young Palestinians who cannot contain their anger turn themselves into human bombs and haunt Israel’s streets and public places, blowing themselves up, killing ordinary people, injecting terror into daily life, and eventually hardening both societies’ suspicion and mutual hatred of each other. Each bombing invites merciless reprisals and even more hardship on Palestinian people. But then suicide bombing is an act of individual despair, not a revolutionary tactic. Although Palestinian attacks strike terror into Israeli civilians, they provide the perfect cover for the Israeli government’s daily incursions into Palestinian territory, the perfect excuse for old-fashioned, 19th century colonialism, dressed up as a new-fashioned, 21st century ‘war’.

Israel’s staunchest political and military ally is and always has been the US government. The US government has blocked, along with Israel, almost every UN resolution that sought a peaceful, equitable solution to the conflict. It has supported almost every war that Israel has fought. When Israel attacks Palestine, it is American missiles that smash through Palestinian homes. And every year Israel receives several billion dollars from the US.

What lessons should we draw from this tragic conflict? Is it really impossible for Jewish people who suffered so cruelly themselves — more cruelly perhaps than any other people in history — to understand the vulnerability and the yearning of those whom they have displaced? Does extreme suffering always kindle cruelty? What hope does this leave the human race with? What will happen to the Palestinian people in the event of a victory? When a nation without a state eventually proclaims a state, what kind of state will it be? What horrors will be perpetrated under its flag? Is it a separate state that we should be fighting for, or the rights to a life of liberty and dignity for everyone regardless of their ethnicity or religion? – ARUNDHATI ROY

* * * * *

To delve deeper into the roots of the matter, I share with Awestruck Wanderer’s readers three excellent documentaries. They have taught me a great deal about the history of the Middle East’s conflicts and still have a lot to say to us under the present tragic situation. They are: BBC’s The Birth of Israel; Ilan Ziv’s Six Days in June – The War That Redefined The Middle East; and B.Z. Goldberg’s Promises. I’ve managed to gather these films here – including YouTube or Vimeo full-lenght videos, official synopsis and other relevant information. If you find this documentaries as relevant as I do, please share the knowledge!

the-birth-of-israel

“On 14 May 1948 Prime Minister David Ben Gurion announced the establishment of the state of Israel in the portion of Palestine allocated by the UN as a Jewish state. For the Israelis, the events of 1948 were a triumph; for the Palestinians it was the beggining of the ‘naqba’ – the catastrophe which saw them driven from their homeland. Within 24 hours the armies of Egypt, Jordan and Syria attacked. What followed was the first of many bloody wars between Israel and the Arabs – a bitter struggle which has dominated the region for the past 60 years and continues to threaten global security. Jeremy Bowen travels to Israel and the neighbouring countries involved in the conflict to take a fresh look at the events leading to the foundation of the state of Israel. Using a combination of rarely seen archive footage, historical eyewitness accounts and interviews with the surviving political, diplomatic and military figures of the time from both sides of the divide, Jeremy uses the history of the period as a prism to reflect the current state of the Israeli / Palestinian conundrum. Interviews include Shimon Peres, David Den Gurion’s right hand man and now president of Israel, and Hassan Nusseibeh, Jordanian Ambassador to the UN, among others. Challenging existing myths – promulgated by both sides – about the founding of Israel, this is a fresh perspective on an ongoing conflict.”

BBC Production. 2009. 60 mins.

* * * * *

51G1xnr4yKL

“In June of 1967, a war pitted the Israelis against the Arabs and the US against the Soviet Union. It lasted only 6 days, but it changed the Middle East, and America’s policy towards the region, and the war’s results are embodied in every aspect of the current bloody Middle East conflict. This groundbreaking documentary provides a fresh perspective on the war, bringing to life its battlefields, politics, and the personal histories of the many lives it affected. Today, the regions remains trapped in a never-ending cycle of occupation, terrorism and reprisal, much of which is caused by the same animosity that triggered the war in the first place. Shot in location in Israel, Palestine, Egyps, Syria, Jordan, Moscow and Washingston, and using newly declassified archives, home movie footage and personal photographs, evocative recreations, and dozens of interviews with participants, this film offers unprecedented insight into the story of the Six Day War. With an extraordinary cast of characters – Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, Field Marshal Amer, and Lyndon B. Johnson, to name a few – Six Days in June examins how the war came about, how it was fought, and how it reshaped the regional political landscape… all in six days.”

* * * * *

63131_414649571934638_576853723_n

Brazilian poster for B.Z. Goldberg’s Promises

“B.Z. Goldberg, an American filmmaker who was raised in Jerusalem and is fluent in both Hebrew and Arabic, returned to the Middle East to help make this documentary, which chronicles his encounters with seven children between the ages of 11 and 13, some Israeli and some Palestinian, who discuss their political views, their thoughts about the ongoing violence in their homelands and the possibility of a lasting peace, and the impact the aggression has had upon them. Encompassing extremists and moderates on both sides of the fence, the seven youngsters are interviewed individually and then brought together, where their common interests become clear — as well as the fact that it’s quite possible they’ll never live together in peace. Co-directed by Goldberg with Justine Shapiro and Carlos Bolado, Promises won the Audience Award at the 2001 Rotterdam Film Festival.” – Amg All Movie Guide